Pere Riba (Bimota): Criticism of the structure of the MSMA manufacturers’ association

Whilst the International Motorcycling Federation (FIM) and Superbike promoter Dorna are responsible for the sporting regulations, the MSMA has considerable influence over the technical rules. The acronym stands for Motorcycle Sport Manufacturers Association and comprises one representative from each participating manufacturer.

Proposed changes are only incorporated into the regulations once approved by the MSMA members. This procedure makes perfect sense in principle, as the production-based World Championship should reflect the market, and who better to know the market than the manufacturers themselves. However, this structure also prevents certain decisions from being taken, such as the introduction of standardised electronics or an increase in the maximum engine capacity.

“There are five brands represented in the Superbike series, and unanimity is required for any change. If one brand exercises its veto, the proposed change is rejected,” explained Pere Riba to Corsedimoto. The 57-year-old is a former racing driver and currently the crew chief for Bimota works rider Alex Lowes. “In my view, that makes no sense; it’s not wise. We need a more democratic approach: if three want to change course and two are against it, the majority should prevail. As things stand, one party can block a proposal if it doesn’t suit them.”

On the subject of standardised electronics, for example, BMW is opposed to the idea, as the development of its own ECU is, internally, a political argument in favour of its Superbike programme. Several manufacturers are not keen on a possible increase in engine capacity, which is preventing Aprilia’s return – the current RSV4 has a displacement of 1099 ccm, 99 more than permitted.

“Everything is stagnating, and the result is plain for all to see,” said Riba, summing up the problem. “I’m not blaming Ducati or anyone else. It’s the structure itself that makes no sense.”