Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

  1. Home
  2. /

  3. Formula racing
  4. /

  5. Formula 1
  6. /

  7. News

Advertisement

Did Mercedes’ miscalculation cost Kimi Antonelli his chance of victory in Austria?

The fans were delighted with the thrilling Austrian Grand Prix featuring Russell versus Verstappen. Antonelli closed in from behind, eventually emerging as the fastest man on the track. Did Mercedes cost the championship leader the win?

Formula 1

This article is an automatically generated English version. The original article was published in German.

Mentioned in this article


Advertisement

TV program

Advertisement

Championship leader Kimi Antonelli was hard on himself following the entertaining, traditional Austrian Grand Prix. The 19-year-old Italian said: “I was a bit over-eager in the first few laps; I really didn’t drive well then – far too many mistakes.”

Advertisement

Advertisement

“I struggled with the brakes; the brake pedal felt long and I didn’t have the right feel for them, but that’s no excuse. I lost places and certainly four to five seconds through my own fault.”

“After the tyre change, I got into my stride better and finally found a good rhythm. Towards the end, I finally found my pace, but unfortunately I arrived at the party up front a little too late.”

What the teenager from Bologna doesn’t say: one of the reasons he joined the party a little late was Mercedes’ race strategy.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Let’s rewind: on lap 42, Russell was a second ahead of Verstappen and seven ahead of Antonelli. Mercedes wanted to protect itself against Red Bull Racing cutting the lap time – if the pursuer pits earlier, then sets a very fast pace on fresh tyres, and the leader suddenly finds himself at the back after his own pit stop.

TV program

So Russell pitted on lap 43, which made it clear that the Briton would have to drive a long final stint, requiring clever tyre management. Verstappen took the opposite approach: staying out longer to have fresher tyres at the end.

Mercedes also kept Antonelli out longer – even longer than Verstappen. That cost Kimi around three seconds. But when the chequered flag fell, the Italian was just three tenths of a second behind Max and less than two seconds behind winner Russell.

Would Antonelli have had a chance of winning here with a different strategy? Answer: most likely yes. Because in the final stages of the race, it was striking how Antonelli was not only the fastest man on the track, but there was also hardly any tyre wear visible on his Mercedes. The clever minds at Mercedes probably hadn’t factored that in.

Advertisement

Advertisement

To put it another way: had he made his final tyre change three or four laps earlier, Antonelli wouldn’t have arrived at the party too late – he would probably have been the talk of the party.

Of course, conspiracy theorists will spin this into a theory that Mercedes wanted to prevent a risky head-to-head battle between Russell and Antonelli. That remains pure speculation.

The fact, however, is this: with a slightly different approach, we could well have witnessed an even more thrilling finale.

Seen already?

Don't miss out on any highlights: The Speedweek newsletter, sent out twice a week, delivers the latest news, exclusive commentary and all the important dates from the world of motorsports - directly into your inbox


Topics

  1. Results

  2. Championship Standings

Results

Full standings
  1. Race

  2. Starting grid

  3. Qualifying 3

  4. Qualifying 2

  5. Qualifying 1

  6. Free practice 3

  7. Free practice 2

  8. Free practice 1

Pos

Driver

Driver

Team

Start No.

Rounds

Time

Fastest Lap

Points

01

George Russell

Mercedes-AMG Petronas Formula One Team

George Russell

Mercedes-AMG Petronas Formula One Team

63

71

1:26:37,979

1:10,683

25

02

Max Verstappen

Oracle Red Bull Racing

Max Verstappen

Oracle Red Bull Racing

3

71

+1,611

1:10,483

18

03

Kimi Antonelli

Mercedes-AMG Petronas Formula One Team

Kimi Antonelli

Mercedes-AMG Petronas Formula One Team

12

71

+1,986

1:10,374

15

04

Oscar Piastri

McLaren Formula 1 Team

Oscar Piastri

McLaren Formula 1 Team

81

71

+21,809

1:10,595

12

05

Lewis Hamilton

Scuderia Ferrari HP

Lewis Hamilton

Scuderia Ferrari HP

44

71

+26,393

1:10,946

10

06

Isack Hadjar

Oracle Red Bull Racing

Isack Hadjar

Oracle Red Bull Racing

6

71

+29,399

1:10,947

8

07

Lando Norris

McLaren Formula 1 Team

Lando Norris

McLaren Formula 1 Team

1

71

+31,505

1:10,652

6

08

Charles Leclerc

Scuderia Ferrari HP

Charles Leclerc

Scuderia Ferrari HP

16

71

+45,659

1:10,606

4

09

Liam Lawson

Visa Cash App Racing Bulls Formula One Team

Liam Lawson

Visa Cash App Racing Bulls Formula One Team

30

70

+1 round

1:11,547

2

10

Arvid Lindblad

Visa Cash App Racing Bulls Formula One Team

Arvid Lindblad

Visa Cash App Racing Bulls Formula One Team

41

70

+1 round

1:11,587

1

Events

All Formula 1 events
  • Past

    British Grand Prix

    Silverstone Circuit, Great Britain
    03.–05.07.2026
  • Past

    Belgian Grand Prix

    Circuit de Spa-Francorchamps, Belgien
    17.–19.07.2026
  • Max Verstappen

    Live

    Hungarian Grand Prix

    Hungaroring, Ungarn
    24.–26.07.2026
  • Dutch Grand Prix

    Circuit Zandvoort, Niederlande
    21.–23.08.2026
  • Italian Grand Prix

    Autodromo Nazionale Monza, Italien
    04.–06.09.2026
  1. Past

    British Grand Prix

    Silverstone Circuit, Great Britain
    03.–05.07.2026
  2. Past

    Belgian Grand Prix

    Circuit de Spa-Francorchamps, Belgien
    17.–19.07.2026
  3. Max Verstappen

    Live

    Hungarian Grand Prix

    Hungaroring, Ungarn
    24.–26.07.2026
  4. Dutch Grand Prix

    Circuit Zandvoort, Niederlande
    21.–23.08.2026
  5. Italian Grand Prix

    Autodromo Nazionale Monza, Italien
    04.–06.09.2026

Formula racing News

All news

    Speedweek.com – The best motorsport on the web

    The latest news around the clock, analyzed and commented on by experts, with exclusive behind-the-scenes insights. Here, fans write for fans.

    Reports

    Editorial

    Series